Fig 1. |
Fig 2. |
If Spielberg’s earlier film “Duel” (1971) was an exercise in amplifying our fears of the road then “Jaws” continues this fascination, turning its gaze to the ocean and mining our fears of what lies beneath. “Jaws” continues Spielberg’s exercises in Alfred Hitchcock’s own tradition. Roger Ebert discusses that “Spielberg leaves the shark under the table for most of the movie. And many of its manifestations in the later part of the film are at second hand: We don't see the shark but the results of his actions” (Ebert, 2000). It’s a narrative bait and switch that keeps the audience fretful at the uncertain notion of the killer. Indeed, in not being gratuitous in how the shark is featured, Spielberg keeps any and all tension tightly contained within the frame, as we are forced again and again to confront the ocean. This is felt and seen most abundantly towards the end when Brody, Quint and Hooper are leading the shark back to shore, only we are never directly shown the shore. Always, Spielberg directs his gaze outwards towards the open sea, never letting the audience see how close the characters are to the shore, and to safety. Another scene which is particularly effective in ramping the tension features two would-be shark hunters - after the reward for killing the monster shark. They bait a large hook, attach it to the jetty they’re on and wait for the shark to bite. When it inevitably does, it drags part of the jetty with it causing one of the men to fall into the water. The jetty - now attached to the shark - initially moves out to sea, but quickly turns about to give chase. I mention this scene because not once do we ever see the shark, we only see the jetty floating on the surface. These scenes and others like it lend themselves to the final reveal and make it that much more palpable.
Fig 3. |
In short, “Jaws” builds on Spielberg’s earlier themes of impotence and to an extent the castration complex, positing the place of men in society and their changing fascias amidst great societal change. The technical aspects marking “Jaws” as a complex narrative that picks up the gauntlet laid down by Alfred Hitchcock in terms of tight control over the way in which exemplary cinematography can induce dread, terror, and box office success.
Bibliography
Belinkie, Matthew. “You’re Gonna Need a Bigger Phallic Symbol: Jaws As a Journey from Impotence to Manhood” overthinkingit.com [online] Available at: https://www.overthinkingit.com/2010/06/03/jaws-impotence-manhood-phallic-symbol/ [Accessed 13/2/2016]
Bitch Flicks. “I Think We Need a Bigger Metaphor: Men and Masculinity in ‘Jaws’” Btchflicks.com [online] Available at: http://www.btchflcks.com/2015/06/i-think-we-need-a-bigger-metaphor-men-and-masculinity-in-jaws.html#.Vr5wevKLTWI [Accessed 13/2/2016]
Ebert, Roger. ‘Jaws review’ rogerebert.com [online] Available at: http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/great-movie-jaws-1975 [Accessed 13/2/2016]
Illustrations
Fig 1. Jaws Poster [image] Available at: http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/71CTreJGV5L._SL1500_.jpg
Fig 2. Three men on a boat [image] Available at: https://monsterawarenessmonth.files.wordpress.com/2011/02/jaws_172703s.jpg
Fig 3. Dolly zoom [image] Available at: http://static.squarespace.com/static/517ebeaae4b01eeb7ae91027/t/52311dbee4b06ab69d1dfb47/1378950591827/martin%20brody%202.jpg?format=500w
No comments:
Post a Comment